West Shewa and East wollega Zones have a promising climatic condition for irrigation, considering irrigation potential of zones irrigation pump has been distributed for small holder pumped irrigation to increase major irrigated crops production and productivity. Thus, this study was tailored to assess the constraints and financial profitability of major pump irrigated crops with a view to update information that are already documented in the literature. This research contributes to a better understanding of the financial profitability of pumped irrigated agricultural crops. Multistage and purposive sampling method was used to select the farmers for the surveys. The sample has covered irrigation pump user on proportion to size basis. The primary data were generated through conducting a well-designed farm level survey. The survey was conducted covering 237 Small holder pumped irrigator. A profit function approach was used to examine profitability of major pumped irrigation in study areas. The major problems of pumped small holder irrigation were technical issues, economic barriers, socio-institutional factors and environmental pressures. Financial profitability has been estimated for Wheat, cabbage, Tomato, potato, Onion and green pepper and Onion had the highest Net farm income of 47569.30ETB followed by Tomato which has NFI of 40651.85ETB. Although the returns from onion were high as compared to the other crops considered, tomato were widely grown by the farmers in the study areas. Thus, concerned bodies should support pumped irrigation farmers to expand onion and tomato production by reducing other irritated crops in order o increase farm income from pumped irrigation. Irrigation researchers should work on water productivity increment.
| Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 14, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20261401.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-7 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Constraints, Irrigation, Major Crops, Pump and Profitability
n===192 Zone | Woreda | Total Pump User | Selected user as respondent |
|---|---|---|---|
West Shewa | Bako Tibe | 818 | 29 |
Dandi | 738 | 31 | |
Ejersa Lafo | 334 | 32 | |
Tokkee Kuttayee | 150 | 31 | |
East Wollega | Sibu Sire | 263 | 30 |
Diga | 220 | 30 | |
Wayyu Tuqa | 124 | 25 | |
Guto | 568 | 29 |
Districts | Crops Irrigated | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wheat | Head cabbage | Tomato | Potato | Onion | Green pepper | Maize | |
Bako Tibe | 0 | 7 | 26 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 0 |
Dandi | 29 | 6 | 4 | 19 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
Ejersa Lafo | 21 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 0 |
T/kutaye | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 12 |
W/tuqaa | 9 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 16 |
G/giddaa | 18 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 17 |
Diggaa | 8 | 0 | 28 | 16 | 16 | 4 | 6 |
S/sire | 2 | 3 | 19 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 19 |
Total | 90 | 28 | 97 | 65 | 60 | 33 | 73 |
Land tenure | N | Min | Max | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total land size allocated for irrigation (ha) | 237 | 0.0625 | 4.5 | 0.95 |
Owned land (ha) | 220 | 0.0625 | 4.50 | 0.61 |
Rent in (ha) | 41 | 0.090 | 1.50 | 0.50 |
Share cropping in | 6 | 0.0625 | 0.5 | 0.74 |
Crop type | N | Min | Max | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wheat | 87 | 0.125 | 4 | 0.68 |
Head cabbage | 28 | 0.125 | 0.5 | 0.21 |
Tomato | 100 | 0.125 | 2.25 | 0.48 |
Potato | 66 | 0.0625 | 2 | 0.43 |
Onion | 55 | 0.125 | 1 | 0.39 |
Green pepper | 33 | 0.125 | 1.5 | 0.38 |
No. | Constraints | Percent | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Limited knowledge on irrigation operation | 7 | 6 |
2 | Disease and pests problems | 18 | 2 |
3 | Conflict on water b/n users | 10 | 4 |
4 | Water scarcity | 25 | 1 |
5 | Poor physical land structure for irrigation | 6 | 7 |
6 | Lack of improved irrigation seed supplier | 14 | 3 |
7 | Lack of extension service for farmers on water mgt | 3 | 10 |
8 | Problems of canal damages | 5 | 8 |
9 | Increment of pump initial pump cost | 8 | 5 |
10 | Marking constraints for irrigation product | 4 | 9 |
Parameter at average | Crop irrigated | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wheat | Cabbage | Tomato | Potato | Onion | Green peper | |||||||
Actual data | Per Ha | Actual data | Per Ha | Actual data | Per Ha | Actual data | Per Ha | Actual data | Per Ha | Actual data | Per Ha | |
Investment cost of pump | 24720 | 24720 | 24720 | 24720 | 24720 | 24720 | 24720 | 24720 | 24720 | 24720 | 24720 | 24720 |
Fertilizer | 6070.9 | 8927.8 | 2632.4 | 12535.5 | 6166.1 | 12846.1 | 5397.4 | 11244.6 | 5797.13 | 12077.3 | 3713 | 9771 |
Cost of seed | 4656.6 | 6847.9 | 908.1 | 4324.4 | 2803.5 | 5840.6 | 6105.2 | 12719.2 | 5580 | 11625 | 5620.3 | 14790.2 |
Chemicals (pesticides and insecticides) | 895 | 1316.2 | 2354.7 | 11213.1 | 8536.4 | 17784.2 | 845.4 | 1761.3 | 2475.4 | 5157 | 1559.5 | 4104 |
Fuel (benzene and Nefta) | 2790.7 | 4103.9 | 2271.5 | 10817 | 3603.1 | 7506.5 | 2343.2 | 4881.7 | 4013.3 | 8361 | 2594 | 6826.3 |
Labor | 2430 | 3573.7 | 1794.7 | 8546.4 | 6835.3 | 14240.2 | 1512.5 | 3151 | 3718.1 | 7746 | 1956.2 | 5148.02 |
Cost of land | 2,718.7 | 3998.1 | 2,494.4 | 11878.2 | 7683.7 | 16007.7 | 1909.7 | 3978.6 | 2670.8 | 5564.2 | 2762.5 | 7269.73 |
Other costs | 2325.8 | 3420.3 | 1108.1 | 5276.7 | 2662.5 | 5546.8 | 1545 | 3218.7 | 1637.3 | 3411.2 | 1050 | 2763.1 |
Total production cost | 21,887.8 | 32187.9 | 13,563.9 | 64590.2 | 38,290.7 | 79772.3 | 19658.6 | 40955.4 | 21732.5 | 45276 | 19255.6 | 50672.7 |
Production value | 34,892.8 | 51312.9 | 18,997.4 | 90464 | 78948.6 | 164476.25 | 41,944 | 87383.3 | 69301.8 | 144378 | 55143.2 | 145113 |
Net return per year | 13005 | 19125 | 5433.4 | 25873.7 | 40651.8 | 84691.3 | 22,285.4 | 46428 | 47569.3 | 99102.7 | 35887.6 | 94441 |
FAO | Food and Agricultural Organization |
TVC | Total Variable Cost |
TFC | Total Fixed Cost |
DAP | Ammonium Phosphate |
NPS | Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sulfur |
| [1] | FAO. 1992. Small-scale pumped irrigation: energy and cost. FAO manual prepared by Kay M and Hatcho. N. Rome. |
| [2] | Mohammed, M., and Shallo, L. (2020). Impact of Adopting Motor Pump Technology on Smallholder Farmers' Income: Empirical Evidence from Southern Ethiopia. American Journal of Economics 2020, 10(4): 241-256 |
| [3] | West Shewa Zone Irrigation Authority, 2020: Annual Report. |
| [4] | Langan, S., Kebede, H., Tadesse, D., Terefe, B. 2015. Proceedings of the Launching Workshop of the Agricultural Water Management Platform, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 15-16 January 2015. Colombo. |
| [5] | Lipton Michael, Julie Litchfield and Jean-Marc Faurès. 2003. The effects of irrigation on poverty: A Framework for Analysis. Journal of Water Policy, 5 (2003). |
| [6] | Makombe, G., Kelemework, D., Aredo, D. 2007. A comparative analysis of rain fed and irrigated agricultural production in Ethiopia. Irrigation and Drainage Systems: 21: 35-44. |
| [7] | Getacher, T., Mesfin, A. and Gebre-Egziabher, G. 2013. Adoption and impacts of an irrigation technology: Evidence from household level data in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 8(38), pp. 4766-4772. |
| [8] | Gebregziabher, G., Giordano, AM., Langan, SJ., Namara, RE., (2014). Economic analysis of factors influencing adoption of motor pumps in Ethiopia. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics. 6(12): 490-500. |
| [9] | Yamane, Y. (1967). Mathematical Formulae for Sample Size Determination. |
| [10] | Smith, L. E. (2004) Assessment of the Contribution of Irrigation to Poverty Reduction and Sustainable Livelihoods. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 20, 243-257. |
| [11] | Tucker, J. and Yirgu, L. (2011) Water in Food Security Assessment and Drought Early Warning. |
| [12] | Hussain, I. and Hanjra, M. A. (2004) Irrigation and Poverty Alleviation: Review of the Empirical Evidence. Irrigation and Drainage, 53, 1-15. |
APA Style
Refera, S., Genemo, G. (2026). Assessment of Constraints Identification and Profitability Analysis of Major Crops Pumped Irrigation in West Shewa and East Wollega, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 14(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261401.11
ACS Style
Refera, S.; Genemo, G. Assessment of Constraints Identification and Profitability Analysis of Major Crops Pumped Irrigation in West Shewa and East Wollega, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2026, 14(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20261401.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20261401.11,
author = {Shelema Refera and Gudeta Genemo},
title = {Assessment of Constraints Identification and Profitability Analysis of Major Crops Pumped Irrigation in West Shewa and East Wollega, Western Oromia, Ethiopia},
journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
volume = {14},
number = {1},
pages = {1-7},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20261401.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261401.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20261401.11},
abstract = {West Shewa and East wollega Zones have a promising climatic condition for irrigation, considering irrigation potential of zones irrigation pump has been distributed for small holder pumped irrigation to increase major irrigated crops production and productivity. Thus, this study was tailored to assess the constraints and financial profitability of major pump irrigated crops with a view to update information that are already documented in the literature. This research contributes to a better understanding of the financial profitability of pumped irrigated agricultural crops. Multistage and purposive sampling method was used to select the farmers for the surveys. The sample has covered irrigation pump user on proportion to size basis. The primary data were generated through conducting a well-designed farm level survey. The survey was conducted covering 237 Small holder pumped irrigator. A profit function approach was used to examine profitability of major pumped irrigation in study areas. The major problems of pumped small holder irrigation were technical issues, economic barriers, socio-institutional factors and environmental pressures. Financial profitability has been estimated for Wheat, cabbage, Tomato, potato, Onion and green pepper and Onion had the highest Net farm income of 47569.30ETB followed by Tomato which has NFI of 40651.85ETB. Although the returns from onion were high as compared to the other crops considered, tomato were widely grown by the farmers in the study areas. Thus, concerned bodies should support pumped irrigation farmers to expand onion and tomato production by reducing other irritated crops in order o increase farm income from pumped irrigation. Irrigation researchers should work on water productivity increment.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of Constraints Identification and Profitability Analysis of Major Crops Pumped Irrigation in West Shewa and East Wollega, Western Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Shelema Refera AU - Gudeta Genemo Y1 - 2026/01/20 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261401.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20261401.11 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 1 EP - 7 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261401.11 AB - West Shewa and East wollega Zones have a promising climatic condition for irrigation, considering irrigation potential of zones irrigation pump has been distributed for small holder pumped irrigation to increase major irrigated crops production and productivity. Thus, this study was tailored to assess the constraints and financial profitability of major pump irrigated crops with a view to update information that are already documented in the literature. This research contributes to a better understanding of the financial profitability of pumped irrigated agricultural crops. Multistage and purposive sampling method was used to select the farmers for the surveys. The sample has covered irrigation pump user on proportion to size basis. The primary data were generated through conducting a well-designed farm level survey. The survey was conducted covering 237 Small holder pumped irrigator. A profit function approach was used to examine profitability of major pumped irrigation in study areas. The major problems of pumped small holder irrigation were technical issues, economic barriers, socio-institutional factors and environmental pressures. Financial profitability has been estimated for Wheat, cabbage, Tomato, potato, Onion and green pepper and Onion had the highest Net farm income of 47569.30ETB followed by Tomato which has NFI of 40651.85ETB. Although the returns from onion were high as compared to the other crops considered, tomato were widely grown by the farmers in the study areas. Thus, concerned bodies should support pumped irrigation farmers to expand onion and tomato production by reducing other irritated crops in order o increase farm income from pumped irrigation. Irrigation researchers should work on water productivity increment. VL - 14 IS - 1 ER -