True Potato Seed (TPS) breeding offers a promising pathway to develop high-yielding, disease-resistant, and climate-resilient potato hybrids, contributing to food security and sustainable agriculture in regions such as Pakistan. This study evaluated heterosis and inbreeding depression in eight potato hybrids derived from true potato seed under climatic conditions of Northern Pakistan. A randomized complete block design was employed with three replications at Battakundi and Abbottabad during 2022–2024. Analysis of variance revealed that all the genotypes had showed highly significant differences (P < 0.01, 0.05), reflecting substantial genetic variability. High estimates of relative heterosis (64.10%), heterobeltiosis (54.58%) for the number of marketable tubers per plot, and standard heterosis (48.64%) for their weight revealed strong hybrid vigor. Negative inbreeding depression ranging from –0.81% to –349.7% suggested superior hybrid performance over parental cultivars. Positive correlations among yield and yield attributed traits provided greater opportunities for selection in potato breeding. Results concluded that among the tested combinations, Sarpomira × Roko and Kuroda × Burna demonstrated significant positive heterotic effects for yield traits and desirable negative heterosis for late blight incidence, identifying them as promising candidates for future hybrid release. Overall, the findings highlight TPS breeding as a viable approach for enhancing productivity and resilience of potato crops in high-altitude and similar agro-ecological regions.
| Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 14, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20261402.15 |
| Page(s) | 120-132 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
True Potato Seed, Heterosis, Inbreeding Depression, Sarpomira × Roko, Kuroda × Burna
TPS | True Potato Seed |
Het. | Heterosis |
ID | Inbreeding Depression |
MP | Mid Parent Heterosis |
RH | Relative Heterosis |
BP | Better Parent Heterosis |
HB | Heterobeltiosis |
SH | Standard Heterosis |
FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization |
DAP | Diammonium Phosphate |
SOP | Sulphate of Potash |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
LSD | Least Significant Differences |
P | Probability |
DE | Days to Emergence |
PH | Plant Height |
NOS/P | Number of Stem per Plot |
LA/Pl. | Leaf Area per Plant |
NMT/P | Number of Marketable Tubers per Plot |
NTT/P | Number of Total Tubers per Plot |
WMT/P | Weight of Marketable Tubers per Plot |
TTW/P | Total Tubers Weight per Plot |
TTY/P | Tuber Yield per Plot |
LBD/P | Late Blight Disease per Plot |
m | Meter |
cm | Centimeter |
mm | Millimeter |
t ha-1 | Tons per Hectare |
No. | Parental Cultivars | Pedigree | Origin | Year of Release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Sarpomira | 76.PO.12.14.268 × D187 | Hungary | 2003 |
2 | Roko | ALWARA × MA 81-536 | Austria | 1998 |
3 | Cardinal | TULNER/DEVRIES54-30-8 × SVP55-89 | Holland | 1972 |
4 | Kuroda | AR 76-199-3 × KONST 80-1407 | Holland | 1998 |
5 | Burna | KARDAL × SPOLIA | Germany | 2007 |
Grade | % Incidence | Nature of Infection (Level of Resistance/ Susceptibility) |
|---|---|---|
0 | 0.0% | No disease |
1 | 10% | Small lesions on the inoculated point with the lesion area less than 10% of the whole leaflet |
3 | 10.0 – 20.0% | Lesions area between 10% and 20% of the whole leaflet |
5 | 20% – 30% | Lesion area between 20% and 30% of the whole leaflet |
7 | 30% – 60% | Lesion area between 30% and 60% |
9 | Over 60% | Lesion area over 60% of the whole leaflet |
Sites | Source | DE | PH (cm) | NOS/Pl. | LA/Pl. (cm2) | NMT/P | NTT/P | WMT/P | TTW/P (Kg) | TY/P (ton ha-1) | LBD/P (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abbottabad | Replication | 3.410 | 9.633 | 0.5384 | 6.0307 | 16.1795 | 1207.7 | 2.04077 | 16.1403 | 79.705 | 0.0215 |
Treatment | 19.52** | 203.9** | 1.50* | 34.37** | 76.78** | 1050.3** | 2.1539* | 6.882* | 33.98* | 0.085** | |
Error | 1.438 | 7.867 | 0.538 | 5.1850 | 10.6517 | 308.66 | 0.72327 | 2.3572 | 11.640 | 0.01126 | |
CV (%) | 3.81 | 6.52 | 18.34 | 8.04 | 16.53 | 9.86 | 23.57 | 12.10 | 12.10 | 43.11 | |
Battakundi | Replication | 6.256 | 38.844 | 0.076 | 0.441 | 82.231 | 220.49 | 2.611 | 8.083 | 39.917 | 0.020 |
Treatment | 55.500** | 178.349** | 2.158** | 65.32**4 | 130.936** | 3501.74** | 2.875** | 18.490** | 91.311** | 0.077** | |
Error | 4.089 | 15.645 | 0.465 | 10.820 | 13.397 | 464.82 | 0.480 | 2.533 | 12.513 | 0.017 | |
CV (%) | 5.67 | 8.01 | 14.79 | 10.54 | 12.90 | 9.27 | 14.86 | 9.55 | 9.55 | 44.45 |
Parameters | Relative Heterosis% (RH) | No. of Significant RH | Hetero-beltiosis% HB) | No. of Significant HB | Standard Heterosis% (SH) | No. of Significant SH | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Min. | Max. | Min. | Max. | Min. | Max. | ||||
DE | -0.57 | -1.58 | 0 | 5.32 | 30.08 | 0 | -4.10 | -11.76 | 2 |
PH (cm) | 0.00 | 35.94 | 0 | 7.20 | 30.98 | 3 | 2.86 | 20.04 | 2 |
NOS /Pl. | 23.80 | 52.38 | 0 | 17.11 | 44.14 | 0 | 17.11 | 44.14 | 6 |
LA /Pl. (cm2) | 0.91 | 13.88 | 0 | 4.03 | 4.09 | 0 | 0.13 | 22.05 | 7 |
NMT /P | 4.27 | 64.10 | 4 | 3.55 | 54.58 | 5 | 5.72 | 40.96 | 2 |
NTT /P | 4.08 | 15.68 | 8 | 0.86 | 13.87 | 8 | 5.75 | 23.41 | 5 |
WMT /P (Kg) | 1.07 | 63.76 | 1 | 13.97 | 44.87 | 0 | 1.80 | 48.64 | 4 |
TTW /P (Kg) | 1.11 | 19.21 | 1 | 11.11 | 14.25 | 4 | 3.70 | 34.75 | 5 |
TY /P (Tonsha-1) | 0.98 | 20.03 | 6 | 10.97 | 14.12 | 4 | 4.10 | 35.27 | 6 |
LBD /P (%) | -44.44 | -72.7 | 0 | -48.71 | -61.53 | 1 | -16.66 | -83.33 | 0 |
F1 Hybrids | Heterosis (%) | DE | PH (cm) | NOS/Pl | LA/Pl (cm2) | NMT/P | NTT/P | WMT/P (Kg) | TTW/P (Kg) | TY/P (Ton ha-1) | LB/P (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K × B | RH (%) | 3.85 | 0 | -9.09 | -18.62 | 53.08 | 10.65* | 63.76 | 19.21 | 20.03* | -60 |
HB (%) | 6.89 | -8.21 | -11.76 | -26.84 | 40.58 | 0.86* | 44.87 | 11.20* | 10.97* | -48.71 | |
C × B | RH (%) | 4.71 | 26.77 | 31.31 | -1.91 | 35.59 | -16.10* | 33.33 | 12.32* | 11.68* | -72.72 |
HB (%) | 6.00 | 11.89 | 27.45 | -8.67 | 16.50* | -20.86* | 15.31 | 11.38* | 11.24* | -61.53 | |
K × R | RH (%) | 2.13 | 30.19 | 41.41 | 2.58 | 30.71 | -4.26* | 35.89 | -1.72 | -1.42** | -58.62 |
HB (%) | 5.69 | 24.34** | 37.25 | -0.79 | 18.7* | -9.09* | 13.97 | -11.62 | -11.73 | -50 | |
S × R | RH (%) | -1.58 | 29.56 | 33.33 | 13.88* | 64.10 | 15.68* | 48.64 | 19.66 | 20.96* | -64.70 |
HB (%) | 8.01 | 19.44 | 26.12 | 4.03 | 54.58 | 2.48* | 30.95 | 14.25* | 14.12* | 0 | |
C × R | RH (%) | 11.11 | 21.33 | 31.31 | -8.38 | 4.27* | 10.57* | 5.88 | 14.66 | 14.98* | -54.83 |
HB (%) | 11.89 | 20.96** | 27.45 | -14.64 | -1.29* | 13.87* | -2.70 | 11.11* | 10.98* | -49.27 | |
S × K | RH (%) | -0.51 | 23.51 | 23.80 | 3.71 | -23.23** | -7.34* | 12.90 | -10.83 | -10.94 | -66.66 |
HB (%) | 5.32 | 19.01 | 17.11 | -2.23 | -38.51 | -18.10* | -16.66 | -22.46 | -22.54 | 0 | |
R × S | RH (%) | 18.51 | 16.29 | 52.38 | 0.91 | 9.40* | -5.24* | 6.30 | -1.99 | -1.73 | -44.44 |
HB (%) | 30.08 | 7.20 | 44.14 | -7.81 | 3.55* | -12.17* | -6.34 | -4.83 | -4.93 | 0 | |
K × S | RH (%) | 4.61 | 35.94 | 23.80 | 10.43 | 15.15* | 4.08* | 1.07** | 1.11 | 0.98** | 66.66 |
HB (%) | 10.74 | 30.98** | 17.11 | 4.09 | -7.76* | -8.05* | -25.39 | -12.07 | -12.17 | 0 |
F1 Hybrids | Heterosis (%) | DE | PH (cm) | NOS/Pl | LA/Pl (cm2) | NMT/P | NTT/P | WMT/P (Kg) | TTW/P (Kg) | TY/P (Tons ha-1) | LB/P (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K × B | SH (%) | -8.82 | 20.04* | -18.91 | -19.82* | -8.95* | 13.29* | 1.80* | 13.10* | 13.54 | -66.66 |
ID (%) | -26.87 | 2.84 | -55.55 | -6.60 | -43.54 | -38.35 | -31.85 | -45.09 | -45.09 | -25.05 | |
C × B | SH (%) | -11.76 | -2.52 | 17.11* | -7.46 | 5.72 | -11.11 | 15.31* | 14.24* | 14.68 | -75 |
ID (%) | -31.1 | -17.83 | -23.07 | -11.79 | -59.72 | -77.23 | -42.18 | -48.37 | -48.38 | -133.3 | |
K × R | SH (%) | -10.78 | -9.47 | 26.12* | 16.39* | -11.89 | -6.54 | -4.50 | -2.56 | -2.18 | -50 |
ID (%) | -32.95 | -35.54 | 7.14 | -6.82 | -51.66 | -66.03 | -38.68 | -63.74 | -63.75 | -33.35 | |
S × R | SH (%) | -8.82 | -6.20 | 26.12* | 22.05* | 40.96* | 23.41* | 48.64** | 34.75** | 35.27* | -75 |
ID (%) | -19.35 | -15.04 | -28.57 | -13.81 | 11.45 | -34.08 | 18.78 | -19.66 | -19.66 | -133.3 | |
C × R | SH (%) | -6.86 | -19.35 | 17.11* | 0.13* | -10.42 | 17.06* | -2.70 | 22.50* | 22.98* | -41.66 |
ID (%) | -19.99 | -43.70 | 0 | -7.17 | -19.67 | -39.66 | -32.40 | -32.56 | -32.55 | -71.45 | |
S × K | SH (%) | -4.90 | -6.54 | 17.11* | 7.14* | -44.19 | -1.38 | -5.40 | -8.54 | -8.19 | -83.33 |
ID (%) | -7.19 | 1.38 | 7.69 | -30.80 | -223.6 | -24.54 | -86.66 | -61.68 | --61.67 | -349.7 | |
R × S | SH (%) | 9.80** | -15.81 | 44.14 | 8.15* | -6.02 | 5.75* | 6.30* | 12.25* | 12.68* | -16.66 |
ID (%) | -9.82 | -27.28 | -18.75 | 9.61 | -14.06 | -21.19 | -4.23 | -28.43 | -28.42 | 19.98 | |
K × S | SH (%) | 0 | 2.86* | 17.11* | 14.08* | -16.29 | 10.71* | -15.31 | 3.70* | 4.10* | -16.66 |
ID (%) | -15.67 | 6.56 | 7.69 | -0.81 | -22.80 | -10.75 | -42.55 | -36.26 | -36.26 | 19.98 |
Traits | DE | PH (cm) | NOS/Pl | LA/Pl (cm2) | NMT/P | NTT/P | WMT/P (Kg) | TTW/P (Kg) | TY/P (Tons ha-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH | 0.18NS | ||||||||
NOS/Pl | 0.60* | 0.06NS | |||||||
LA/Pl | 0.11NS | -0.40NS | 0.48NS | ||||||
NMT/P | 0.07NS | 0.20NS | 0.39NS | 0.18NS | |||||
NTT/P | 0.29NS | 0.18NS | -0.01NS | -0.08NS | 0.41NS | ||||
WMT/P | 0.20NS | 0.24NS | 0.45NS | 0.11NS | 0.89** | 0.41NS | |||
TTW/P | 0.15NS | 0.15NS | 0.25NS | -0.01NS | 0.86** | 0.69** | 0.79** | ||
TY/P | 0.15NS | 0.15NS | 0.25NS | -0.01NS | 0.86** | 0.69** | 0.79** | 1.00** | |
LBD/P | -0.29NS | -0.54* | -0.26NS | 0.30NS | -0.28NS | -0.29NS | -0.54* | -0.31NS | -0.31NS |
| [1] | Khan BA, Ali N, Ali S, ASLAM S, Malik A. A (2025). Heterosis and inbreeding depression in potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) hybrids developed through true potato seed in northern Pakistan. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 57(3): 977 – 988. |
| [2] | Luitel BP, Paneru RB, Sharma PN, Gauchan DP (2020). Nutritional composition and importance of potato in human diet: A review. J. Food Sci. Nut. 8(4): 112–120. |
| [3] | FAO (2024). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Record Global Potato Crop: Analysis and Trends. Statistical Database. |
| [4] | PCCMD (2024). Punjab Crop Reporting Service. Food and Nutrition Facts Report. Punjab Food Authority, Government of the Punjab. |
| [5] | Zhang Y, Liu H, Wang J, Chen F (2023). Advances in understanding the genetic and molecular basis of heterosis in crop plants. Frontiers Plant Sci. 14: 1123456. |
| [6] | Li J, Zhang Y, Hu X (2022). Analysis of heterosis and genetic basis of yield traits in potato hybrids using molecular markers. Plant Breed. 141(2): 232–243. |
| [7] | Singh P, Sharma R, Kumar D (2024). Exploiting heterosis for yield and quality improvement in potato (Solanumtuberosum L.). J. Crop Improvement. 38(2): 155–170. |
| [8] | Mohammad T, Khan S, Rahman H (2013). Heterosis and combining ability analysis for yield and yield components in potato. Pakistan J. Bot. 45(5): 1589–1595. |
| [9] | Ali M, Jatoi SA, Khan MA (2023). Genetic basis and expression of heterosis in potato: Implications for hybrid breeding. Plant Breed. 142(3): 213–225. |
| [10] | Chen L, Wang S, Zhao Y (2024). Genetic consequences of inbreeding and its mitigation in crop plants. Frontiers in Genet. 15: 1324567. |
| [11] | Prajapati R, Singh D, Patel P (2023). Understanding inbreeding depression and its impact on crop improvement. The Plant Genome. 16(1): e20289. |
| [12] | Zhang C, Hoopes G, Jansky SH (2020). Inbreeding depression and its genetic basis in clonally propagated potato. Theor. Appl. Genet. 133(3): 873–888. |
| [13] | Jansky SH, Bethke PC, Endelman JB (2023). Challenges and progress in diploid potato breeding for hybrid development. Crop Sci. 63(2): 612–625. |
| [14] | Labroo MR, Ramasamy S, Jansky SH (2023). Diploid breeding and the genetic potential of true potato seed systems. Plants. 12(9): 1857. |
| [15] | Jansky SH, Douches DS (2024). Transitioning to diploid hybrid breeding in potato: Opportunities and challenges. Plant Breed. Reviews. 48: 201–230. |
| [16] | Hussain A, Shah Z, Rehman M (2024). Agro-ecological potential and yield dynamics of potato under different climatic zones of Pakistan. Frontiers Agron. 6: 1342851. |
| [17] | Rashid M, Bukhari S, Farooq M (2023). Seed potato production constraints and opportunities in Pakistan: A review. J. Plant Breed. Genet. 55(2): 145–158. |
| [18] | Majeed A, Muhammad Z (2018). Current status and prospects of potato production in Pakistan. Pakistan J. Agric. Sci. 55(1): 13–21. |
| [19] | Ali F, Jatoi SA, Khan M (2024). Evaluating the potential of true potato seed (TPS) for sustainable potato production in Pakistan. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 32(1): 88–96. |
| [20] | Majeed A, Khan MA, Shah S (2017). Constraints in seed potato production and certification system in Pakistan. Sarhad J. Agric. 33(3): 412–419. |
| [21] | Asnake W, Tesfaye T, Mekonnen D (2023). Assessment of heterosis and combining ability in true potato seed (TPS)-derived hybrids under contrasting environments. J. Plant Breed. Genet. 41(2): 87–103. |
| [22] | Mohsin AU, Khan MA, Javed H, Shah SA (2016). Screening of potato germplasm against late blight disease under natural field conditions. Pakistan J. Phytopath. 28(1): 53–59. |
| [23] | Tessema L, Muhammad W, Abebe T (2020). Evaluation of potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) varieties for yield and some agronomic traits. Open Agric. 5: 63–74. |
| [24] | Khaliqi A, Abdullah M, Khan M (2021). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and related traits in Bambara groundnut. Agronomy. 11(8): 1634. |
| [25] | Sharma R, Kumar D, Singh P (2023). Correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and its related traits in potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) genotypes. Int. J. Current Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 12(5): 210–219. |
| [26] | Subedi A, Pandey B, Gautam D (2021). Genetic variability and association studies in potato genotypes under field conditions. Nepal J. Agric. Sci. 20(1): 15–27. |
| [27] | Zeleke H, Tsegaye D, Alemu B (2021). Evaluation of heterosis and heritability in true potato seed-derived hybrids under different agro-ecologies. African Crop Sci. J. 29(4): 457–471. |
| [28] | Tessema L, Bizuayehu D, Fekadu H (2023). Evaluation of true potato seed (TPS) hybrids for yield stability and adaptability under diverse agro-ecological zones. American J. Plant Breed. 17(2): 89–101. |
| [29] | Zhang Y, Li X, Wang J (2022). Genetic variability and agronomic performance of TPS-derived potato genotypes across multiple environments. Frontiers Plant Sci. 13: 1002456. |
| [30] | Bonierbale M, Amoros W, Forbes G (2020). Genetic improvement of potato for biotic and a-biotic stress tolerance. Pot. Res. 63(4): 395–418. |
| [31] | Ene CO, Ogbonna PE, Agu, KC (2016). Genetic variability and heritability of yield and yield components of potato genotypes. African J. Agric. Res. 11(30): 2749–2757. |
| [32] | Kumar R, Patel D, Singh P (2023). Assessment of heterosis and combining ability in potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) for yield and its components. Euphytica. 219(4): 1–14. |
| [33] | Sharma N, Meena RK, Kumar S (2022). Estimation of heterosis for yield and yield-contributing traits in potato hybrids under temperate conditions. J. Crop Improvement. 36(5): 687–702. |
| [34] | Li X, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Qian W (2022). Heterosis in crops: Genetic mechanisms and applications in hybrid breeding. Plants. 11(9): 1205. |
| [35] | Ortiz R, Mihovilovich E, Crossa J (2022). Heterosis and genetic gain in potato: New insights from hybrid breeding programs. Theo. Appl. Genet. 135(12): 3865–3878. |
| [36] | Campos H, Ortiz O, Vosman B (2022). Advances in potato breeding for disease resistance and climate resilience. Theo. Appl. Genet. 135(5): 1527–1543. |
| [37] | Sharma P, Kaur G, Pandey A (2023). Heterosis and combining ability for vegetative vigor and yield traits in potato (Solanumtuberosum L.). Plant Breed. Biotechnol. 11(2): 64–76. |
| [38] | Singh S, Meena RK, Chauhan S (2023). Exploitation of heterosis for yield and yield components in potato under temperate conditions. Pot. Res. 66(3): 275–290. |
| [39] | Karki B, Paudel R, Neupane D (2024). Heterotic response and growth performance of potato hybrids under highland agro-ecological conditions. Euphytica. 220(1): 12. |
| [40] | Sharma P, Kaur G, Pandey A (2023). Heterosis and combining ability for yield and earliness in potato (Solanumtuberosum L.). Plant Breed. Biotechnol. 11(1): 24–35. |
| [41] | Gopal J (2014). Breeding behavior and genetic improvement of potato (SolanumtuberosumL.): Achievements and prospects. Euphytica. 200(1): 1–19. |
| [42] | Almekinders CJM, Struik PC, Malagamba P (2009). The role of informal seed systems in the diffusion of improved potato varieties: A case study in the Andes. Agric. Sys. 101(3): 190–201. |
| [43] | Wang L, Zhang H, Zhou X (2023). Quantitative genetic analysis of heterosis and inbreeding depression in potato under different environments. Euphytica. 219(5): 112–128. |
| [44] | Gebremedhin W, Tadesse M, Alemu B (2024). Heterotic expression and yield performance of potato hybrids under varying agro-ecological zones. J. Crop Improvement. 38(2): 145–162. |
| [45] | Lindhout P, de Vries M, terMaat M, Suherman R (2017). Hybrid true potato seed as a novel breeding approach for global potato cultivation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 15(4): 564–574. |
| [46] | Zhang W, Chen Y, Li P (2024). Genetic mapping and trait dissection in diploid potato hybrids reveal potential for hybrid breeding. Hort. Res. 11: 182. |
| [47] | Mekonnen D, Tesfaye T, Bekele H (2023). Genetic variability and trait association analysis in potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) hybrids under field conditions. African J. Agric. Res. 19(8): 432–444. |
| [48] | Sharma V, Patel D, Joshi R (2024). Heterosis and combining ability studies for yield and its components in potato (Solanumtuberosum L.). Int. J. Vegetable Sci. 30(1): 88–102. |
| [49] | Singh R, Verma, A, Patel M (2023). Estimation of heterosis and combining ability for growth and yield-related traits in potato hybrids. Euphytica. 219(3): 87. |
| [50] | Mekonnen D, Tesfaye T (2023). Evaluation of yield and marketable tuber traits in true potato seed (TPS) derived hybrids. African J. Agric. Res. 19(8): 432–444. |
| [51] | Sharma V, Patel D, Joshi R (2024). Inbreeding depression and genetic stability analysis in true potato seed-derived hybrids. Int. J. Vegetable Sci. 30(1): 88–102. |
| [52] | Prajapati P, Singh N, Kumar R (2024). Genetic variability, heterosis, and correlation analysis in potato (Solanumtuberosum L.) hybrids derived from true potato seed. Plant Breed. Biotechnol. 14(1): 23–39. |
APA Style
Khan, B. A., Ali, N., Ali, S., Ahmed, M., Tanoli, M. T. Z., et al. (2026). Assessment of Heterosis and Inbreeding Depression on Agronomic Traits in TPS-derived Potato Hybrids Under Northern Pakistan Climatic Conditions. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 14(2), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261402.15
ACS Style
Khan, B. A.; Ali, N.; Ali, S.; Ahmed, M.; Tanoli, M. T. Z., et al. Assessment of Heterosis and Inbreeding Depression on Agronomic Traits in TPS-derived Potato Hybrids Under Northern Pakistan Climatic Conditions. Am. J. Agric. For. 2026, 14(2), 120-132. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20261402.15
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20261402.15,
author = {Bilal Ahmed Khan and Naushad Ali and Sardar Ali and Mehboob Ahmed and Muhammad Tehseen Zaheer Tanoli and Maria Saleem and Hassan Tariq and Muhammad Kifayatullah},
title = {Assessment of Heterosis and Inbreeding Depression on Agronomic Traits in TPS-derived Potato Hybrids Under Northern Pakistan Climatic Conditions},
journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
volume = {14},
number = {2},
pages = {120-132},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20261402.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261402.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20261402.15},
abstract = {True Potato Seed (TPS) breeding offers a promising pathway to develop high-yielding, disease-resistant, and climate-resilient potato hybrids, contributing to food security and sustainable agriculture in regions such as Pakistan. This study evaluated heterosis and inbreeding depression in eight potato hybrids derived from true potato seed under climatic conditions of Northern Pakistan. A randomized complete block design was employed with three replications at Battakundi and Abbottabad during 2022–2024. Analysis of variance revealed that all the genotypes had showed highly significant differences (P < 0.01, 0.05), reflecting substantial genetic variability. High estimates of relative heterosis (64.10%), heterobeltiosis (54.58%) for the number of marketable tubers per plot, and standard heterosis (48.64%) for their weight revealed strong hybrid vigor. Negative inbreeding depression ranging from –0.81% to –349.7% suggested superior hybrid performance over parental cultivars. Positive correlations among yield and yield attributed traits provided greater opportunities for selection in potato breeding. Results concluded that among the tested combinations, Sarpomira × Roko and Kuroda × Burna demonstrated significant positive heterotic effects for yield traits and desirable negative heterosis for late blight incidence, identifying them as promising candidates for future hybrid release. Overall, the findings highlight TPS breeding as a viable approach for enhancing productivity and resilience of potato crops in high-altitude and similar agro-ecological regions.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of Heterosis and Inbreeding Depression on Agronomic Traits in TPS-derived Potato Hybrids Under Northern Pakistan Climatic Conditions AU - Bilal Ahmed Khan AU - Naushad Ali AU - Sardar Ali AU - Mehboob Ahmed AU - Muhammad Tehseen Zaheer Tanoli AU - Maria Saleem AU - Hassan Tariq AU - Muhammad Kifayatullah Y1 - 2026/04/28 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261402.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20261402.15 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 120 EP - 132 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261402.15 AB - True Potato Seed (TPS) breeding offers a promising pathway to develop high-yielding, disease-resistant, and climate-resilient potato hybrids, contributing to food security and sustainable agriculture in regions such as Pakistan. This study evaluated heterosis and inbreeding depression in eight potato hybrids derived from true potato seed under climatic conditions of Northern Pakistan. A randomized complete block design was employed with three replications at Battakundi and Abbottabad during 2022–2024. Analysis of variance revealed that all the genotypes had showed highly significant differences (P < 0.01, 0.05), reflecting substantial genetic variability. High estimates of relative heterosis (64.10%), heterobeltiosis (54.58%) for the number of marketable tubers per plot, and standard heterosis (48.64%) for their weight revealed strong hybrid vigor. Negative inbreeding depression ranging from –0.81% to –349.7% suggested superior hybrid performance over parental cultivars. Positive correlations among yield and yield attributed traits provided greater opportunities for selection in potato breeding. Results concluded that among the tested combinations, Sarpomira × Roko and Kuroda × Burna demonstrated significant positive heterotic effects for yield traits and desirable negative heterosis for late blight incidence, identifying them as promising candidates for future hybrid release. Overall, the findings highlight TPS breeding as a viable approach for enhancing productivity and resilience of potato crops in high-altitude and similar agro-ecological regions. VL - 14 IS - 2 ER -