This study evaluated the effects of partially replacing soybean meal (SBM) with comfrey leaf meal (CLM) on the growth performance, carcass characteristics, and economic viability of broiler chickens. Fresh Symphytum officinale leaves were harvested, shade-dried, and milled to produce CLM. Four pelleted experimental diets were formulated to contain 0% (control), 4%, 8%, and 12% CLM inclusion levels. A total of 240 day-old Cobb 500 broiler chicks were brooded for 14 days, after which the birds were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments with three replicates of 20 birds per replicate in a completely randomized design. Growth performance, carcass traits, and economic parameters were evaluated during the growing-finishing phase. Final body weight, average daily gain (ADG), and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were significantly reduced (P<0.05) in birds fed 4%, 8%, and 12% CLM compared to the control. Final body weights were 2245.40 g, 2119.06 g, 1833.96 g, and 1485.57 g for 0%, 4%, 8%, and 12% inclusion levels, respectively. Corresponding ADG values were 66.26, 61.30, 51.30, and 38.30 g/bird/day, while ADFI values were 149.86, 148.00, 143.76, and 139.79 g/bird/day, respectively. Feed conversion ratio did not differ between 0% and 4% CLM (P>0.05) but was significantly poorer at higher inclusion levels. Slaughter weight differed significantly among treatments (P<0.05), whereas dressing percentage and organ weights were not significantly affected (P>0.05). Economic analysis indicated that 4% CLM inclusion produced the most favorable cost differential (160.96 TSH/kg gain) and relative cost reduction (5.90%) compared to the control. These findings suggest that partial replacement of SBM with CLM at 4% inclusion level maintains acceptable performance and carcass traits while improving economic efficiency, whereas higher inclusion levels negatively affect broiler performance.
| Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 14, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20261404.12 |
| Page(s) | 173-184 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Broiler Chickens, Comfrey Leaf Meal, Soybean Meal Replacement, Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, Economic Viability
Parameters | Value (%) |
|---|---|
Moisture | 9.13 |
Dry matter (DM) | 90.87 |
Crude protein (CP) | 20.03 |
Crude fibre (CF) | 13.12 |
Ether extract (EE) | 0.75 |
Ash | 28.85 |
Ingredient | DM (%) | CP (%) | EE (%) | CF (%) | Ash (%) | ME (kcal/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maize | 87.4 | 8.6 | 4 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 3231 |
Soybean meal | 92.3 | 45.5 | 1.5 | 6.4 | 6.5 | 2443 |
Fish meal | 90.1 | 57.3 | 8.5 | 1 | 7.3 | 2820 |
Sunflower seedcake meal | 90 | 36 | 2 | 20 | 6.8 | 1980 |
Maize bran | 93.5 | 8.9 | 4 | 9.2 | 6 | 1630 |
Rice bran | 88.9 | 13.5 | 99.9 | 7.5 | 4 | 3120 |
DM (%) | Crude Protein (%) | Crude Fibre (%) | Crude Fat (%) | Ash (%) | ME Kcal/kgDM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grower Feed | ||||||
T0 | 87.06 | 19.85 | 4.2 | 4.75 | 5.56 | 2971 |
T1 | 87.62 | 19.65 | 4.58 | 4.73 | 6.18 | 2959 |
T2 | 87.78 | 19.3 | 4.95 | 4.65 | 6.25 | 2862 |
T3 | 87.95 | 18.9 | 5.32 | 4.58 | 6.32 | 2862 |
Finisher Feed | ||||||
T0 | 87.2 | 19.13 | 4 | 5.5 | 5.8 | 3008 |
T1 | 87.35 | 18.64 | 4.35 | 5.42 | 5.88 | 3000 |
T2 | 87.5 | 18.03 | 4.7 | 5.35 | 5.95 | 3002 |
T3 | 87.68 | 17.86 | 5.05 | 5.28 | 6.02 | 2960 |
Parameter | T0 (0%) | T1 (4%) | T2 (8%) | T3 (12%) | SEM | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial Weight (g) | 390.08 | 402.79 | 397.61 | 413.06 | 23.96 | 0.919 |
Final Weight (g) | 2245.40d | 2119.06c | 1833.96b | 1485.57a | 19.32 | <0.001 |
Total Weight Gain (g) | 1855.32d | 1716.28c | 1436b | 1072.51a | 18.58 | <0.001 |
Average Daily Gain (g/bird/day) | 66.26d | 61.30c | 51.30b | 38.30a | 0.66 | <0.001 |
Average Daily Feed Intake (g/bird/day) | 149.86d | 148.68c | 143.79b | 139.79a | 0.00 | <0.001 |
Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) | 2.34a | 2.49a | 2.89b | 3.78c | 0.04 | <0.001 |
Parameter | T0 (0%) | T1 (4%) | T2 (8%) | T3 (12%) | SEM | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slaughter weight (g) | 2385.00c | 2250.00c | 1830.33b | 1508.00a | 64.51 | 0.00004*** |
Hot carcass (g) | 1811.00b | 1637.33b | 1252.33a | 992.00a | 71.53 | 0.0002*** |
Dressing% | 75.87a | 72.74a | 68.59a | 65.79a | 2.6 | 0.099ns |
Head (g) | 51.00b | 48.00ab | 40.67ab | 36.33a | 2.58 | 0.014* |
Leg (g) | 77.67a | 72.00a | 72.00a | 69.67a | 6.94 | 0.866ns |
Drumstick (g) | 202.67b | 195.00b | 172.33ab | 139.00a | 8.09 | 0.002** |
Thigh (g) | 261.33c | 235.00bc | 183.67ab | 150.67a | 15.45 | 0.004** |
Breast (g) | 674.67b | 606.67b | 438.67a | 337.00a | 32.66 | 0.0003*** |
Wing (g) | 177.67c | 160.67bc | 136.33ab | 112.67a | 8.71 | 0.004** |
Back Length (cm) | 21.60b | 21.17b | 18.90ab | 17.97a | 0.7 | 0.017* |
Neck (g) | 107.00b | 95.67ab | 76.00ab | 56.00a | 9.08 | 0.018* |
Back (g) | 341.67c | 305.33bc | 238.00ab | 186.33a | 17.18 | 0.001*** |
Proventriculus (g) | 10.00a | 8.33a | 7.33a | 7.00a | 0.85 | 0.132ns |
Gizzard (g) | 22.33a | 23.33ab | 25.67bc | 26.67c | 1.48 | 0.032* |
Heart (g) | 12.67a | 10.67a | 11.00a | 8.67a | 0.91 | 0.082ns |
Spleen (g) | 3.67a | 2.33a | 2.00a | 3.00a | 0.69 | 0.384ns |
Liver (g) | 37.67a | 34.67a | 39.00a | 35.00a | 2.81 | 0.658ns |
Parameters | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial BW (g) | 390.08 | 402.00 | 397.00 | 413.00 |
Final BW (g) | 2245.40 | 2119.06 | 1833.96 | 1485.57 |
weight gain (g) | 1855.32 | 1717.06 | 1436.96 | 1072.57 |
daily weight gain | 66.26 | 61.32 | 51.32 | 38.31 |
Total FI | 4196.08 | 4163.04 | 4026.12 | 3914.12 |
Daily FI | 149.86 | 148.68 | 143.79 | 139.79 |
FCR | 2.34 | 2.49 | 2.89 | 3.78 |
Cost per Kg of feed | 1207.00 | 1059.53 | 1024.83 | 988.69 |
Cost of FI per bird | 5064.67 | 4410.87 | 4126.09 | 3869.85 |
Cost of feed per Kg weight gain (TSH) | 2729.81 | 2568.85 | 2871.40 | 3608.02 |
Differential cost per Kg gain (TSH) of T0 | 160.96 | -302.55 | -736.62 | |
Relative cost per Kg gain (%) of T0 | 5.90 | -11.78 | -25.65 |
ANOVA | Analysis of Variance |
CRD | Complete Randomized Design |
CLM | Comfrey Leaf Meal |
BW | Body Weight |
BWG | Body Weight Gain |
CF | Crude Fibre |
CP | Crude Protein |
DM | Drymatter |
EE | Ether Extract |
FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization |
FCR | Feed Conversion Efficiency |
FI | Feed Intake |
FM | Fish Meal |
GLM | General Linear Model |
LSD | Least Significant Difference |
ME | Metabolizable Energy |
MJME | Megajoules of Metabolizable Energy |
MJ/Kg DM | Megajoules Per Kilogram of Dry Matter |
NBS | National Bureau of Statistics |
NDF | Neutral Detergent Fibre |
NIRS | Near-infrared Reflectance Spectrophotometer |
SBM | Soybean Meal |
SUA | Sokoine University of Agriculture |
TSH | Tanzanian Shillings |
TALIRI | The Tanzania Livestock Research Institute |
| [1] | Bruinsma, J. (2015). WORLD AGRICULTURE : TOWARDS 2015 / 2030 AN FAO PERSPECTIVE Edited by Jelle Bruinsma. |
| [2] | NBS. (2022). Administrative Units Population Distribution Report Tanzania. |
| [3] | FAO. (2018). The future of food and agriculture - Alternative pathways to 2050. Summary version. Rome. 60 pp. |
| [4] | Ringo, E. J., & Lekule, F. P. (2020). Market trends and consumer behaviors and preferences in the Tanzania poultry subsector. An analytical report with recommendations for the public and private sectors. Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Dar es. July. |
| [5] | Leinonen, I. (2019). Environmentally Sustainable Livestock Production. In Environmentally Sustainable Livestock Production. |
| [6] | Mramba, R. P., & Mwantambo, P. A. (2024). The impact of management practices on the disease and mortality rates of broilers and layers kept by small-scale farmers in Dodoma urban district, Tanzania. Heliyon, 10(8), e29624. |
| [7] | Petracci, M., Mudalal, S., Soglia, F., & Cavani, C. (2015). Meat quality in fast-growing broiler chickens. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 71(2), 363-374. |
| [8] | Mutayoba et al., 2011. (2011). The structure, marketing and importance of the commercial and village poultry industry: An analysis of the poultry sector in Tanzania. FAO Animal Production and Health Livestock Country Reviews. |
| [9] | Hocquette, J. F., Tesseraud, S., & Chilliard, Y. (2007). Responses to nutrients in farm animals : implications for production and quality. Animal, The International Journal of Animal Biosciences, 1(9), 1297-1313. |
| [10] | FAO. (2024). Soybean value chain: Tanzania. |
| [11] | Tesfaye, E., Animut, G., Urge, M., & Dessie, T. (2013). Moringa olifera Leaf Meal as an Alternative Protein Feed Ingredient in Broiler Ration. 12(5), 289-297. |
| [12] | Onyimonyi, A. E., Olabode, A., Okeke, G. C., State, E., & State, E. (2009). Performance and Economic Characteristics of Broilers Fed Varying Dietary Levels of Neem Leaf Meal (Azadirachta indica). 8(3), 256-259. |
| [13] | Oloruntola, O. D. (2018). Gliricidia Leaf Meal in Broiler Chickens Diet : Effects on Performance, Carcass, and Haemato-biochemical Parameters. 18(3), 1-9. |
| [14] | de Souza Vilela, J., Andronicos, N. M., Kolakshyapati, M., Hilliar, M., Sibanda, T. Z., Andrew, N. R.,. & Ruhnke, I. (2021). Black soldier fly larvae in broiler diets improve broiler performance and modulate the immune system. Animal Nutrition, 7(3), 695-706. |
| [15] | Nathalie, M. N., Gwladys, N. K., Emile, M., Daloko, D., Lydie, J., Florence, F. A., & Etienne, P. T. (2022). Performance Characteristics and Blood Indices of Broilers Fed Varying Levels of Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Leaf Meal. 10(4), 94-103. |
| [16] | Bareeba et al. (1992). ThepotentialofRussiancomfrey (Symphytumofficinale) asananimalfeedstuff inUganda. In: Stares, J. E., Said, A. N., Kategile, J. K. (Eds.), The Complementarity of Feed Resources for Animal Production in Africa. Proceedings of the Joint Resources Networks Workshop Held in Gaborone, Bot. |
| [17] | Hills, L. D. (2011). Comfrey- Past, Present and Future (Reprint (ed.)). Faber and Faber. |
| [18] | Oster, M., Reyer, H., Keiler, J., Ball, E., Mulvenna, C., Muráni, E., Ponsuksili, S., & Wimmers, K. (2020). Science of the Total Environment Comfrey (Symphytum spp.) as an alternative fi eld crop contributing to closed agricultural cycles in chicken feeding. Science of the Total Environment, 742, 140490. |
| [19] | Oster, M., Reyer, H., Keiler, J., Ball, E., Mulvenna, C., Ponsuksili, S., & Wimmers, K. (2021). Science of the Total Environment Comfrey (Symphytum spp.) as a feed supplement in pig nutrition contributes to regional resource cycles. Science of the Total Environment, 796, 148988. |
| [20] | Oliveira, P. R., Santos, F. R., Duarte, E. F., Guimarães, G. S., Mattos, N. S. C., & Minafra, C. S. (2016). Symbiotics and Aloe vera and Symphytum officinale extracts in broiler feed. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 37(4Supl1), 2677-2690. |
| [21] | Pandey, L. N., Shrestha, R., Shah, M., Baskota, N., & Bhusal, K. (2023). International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews Effects of Comfrey Grass (Symphytum Spp.) Included Diets on the Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Turkey. 4(4), 1442-1447. |
| [22] | Ruzicka, J., Berger-Büter, K., Esslinger, N., & Novak, J. (2021). Assessment of the diversity of comfrey (Symphytum officinale L. and S. × uplandicum Nyman). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 68(7), 2813-2825. |
| [23] | Ţiţei, V., Andreoiu, A. C., Coshman, S., Blaj, A. V., Guţu, A., Marușca, T., & Coşman, V. (2024). Biomass quality of comfrey, Symphytum officinale, and its potential application in the Republic of Moldova. Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy, (1), 922-927. |
| [24] | Esiegwu, A. C. and Obih, T. K. (2021). GROWTH PERFORMANCE, HAEMATOLOGICAL AND SERUM BIOCHEMICAL INDICES OF BROILER STARTER CHICKENS OFFERED DIETARY SUPPLEMENT OF COMFREY LEAVES EXTRACT. 19(1), 48-62. |
| [25] | AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Collaboration International. (2019). Official Methods of Analysis. Method 934.01 for Moisture, Method 984.13 (A-D) for Crude Protein, Method 920.39 (A) for Crude Fat, Method 978.10 for Crude Fiber, AOAC Method 942.05 for Ash Content, AOAC Method 982.30 (a, b, c), 2006 for Amino Acid Profiling. |
| [26] | NRC. (1994). Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. |
| [27] | Aufrère, J., Michalet-Doreau, B., & Cartailler, D. (1988). Prediction of nitrogen degradability of feeds in sacco from solubility in a buffer solution and from their enzymic degradation. |
| [28] | Berglund, I., Larsson, K., & Lindberg, J. E. (1990). Estimation of metabolisable energy for ruminants by near infrared reflectance photometry using multivariate methods. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 52(3), 339-349. |
| [29] | Mishra, S., Vartak, V., & Manager, S. P. (2023). Arima Forecasting In Soymeal And Beyond : An Empirical Study Bridging The Path To Millet-Based Forecasting. 3(2), 574-594. |
| [30] | Anyanwu et. (2022). Variation in growth performance characteristics of broiler finisher birds fed three different leaf meals as additive. 24(1), 139-146. |
| [31] | Ncube, S., Halimani, T. E., Chikosi, E. V. I., & Saidi, P. T. (2018). Effect of Acacia angustissima leaf meal on performance, yield of carcass components and meat quality of broilers. 48(2). |
| [32] | Obadire et al. 2019. (2019). Nigerian Journal of Animal Science and Technology. 2(2), 115-125. |
| [33] | Lüscher, A., Mueller-Harvey, I., Soussana, J. F., Rees, R. M., & Peyraud, J. L. (2014). Potential of legume-based grassland-livestock systems in Europe: A review. Grass and Forage Science, 69(2), 206-228. |
| [34] | Geburek, I., Rutz, L., Gao, L., Kupper, J. H., These, A., & Schrenk, D. (2021). Metabolic Pattern of Hepatotoxic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Liver Cells. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 34(4), 1101-1113. |
| [35] | Cobb-Vantress. (2018). Cobb500 Slow Feather Breeder. |
| [36] | Kudu. (2022). Nutrient Digestibility and Economy of Feed Conversion of. 2195-2199. |
| [37] | Nkukwana, T. T. (2018). Global poultry production : Current impact and future outlook on the South African poultry industry. 48(5). |
| [38] | Morgan, N. K., & Choct, M. (2016). Cassava : Nutrient composition and nutritive value in poultry diets. Animal Nutrition, 2(4), 253-261. |
| [39] | Ubua, J. A., Ozung, P. O., & Inagu, P. G. (2019). Dietary Inclusion of Neem (Azadirachta indica) Leaf Meal Can Influence Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Broiler Chickens. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences, 12(2), 180-186. |
| [40] | Adegbenro, M. (2020). Nutritional Significance of Tropical Vegetables in Poultry Feeding: A Review. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 8(6), 1286-1290. |
| [41] | González et al. (2019). The value of fibre: Engaging the second brain for animal nutrition. Wageningen Academic Publishers. |
| [42] | Ayoola, M. A., Balogun, K. B., & Ogunsipe, M. H. (2018). Performance, carcass characteristics and economics of production of broilers fed diets containing Gliricidia sepium leaf meal as replacement for soya bean meal. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production, 45(5), 46-51. |
| [43] | Akorede et al. (2021). Effects of graded levels of Vernonia amygdalina (Bitter) leaf meal based diets on performance of broilers chickens. 23(2), 222-231. |
APA Style
Kisanzu, A., Luziga, C., Kerario, I. (2026). Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Economic Viability of Broiler Chickens Fed Partial Levels of Comfrey Leaf Meal (Symphytum Officinale). American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 14(4), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261404.12
ACS Style
Kisanzu, A.; Luziga, C.; Kerario, I. Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Economic Viability of Broiler Chickens Fed Partial Levels of Comfrey Leaf Meal (Symphytum Officinale). Am. J. Agric. For. 2026, 14(4), 173-184. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20261404.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20261404.12,
author = {Atilio Kisanzu and Claudius Luziga and Isack Kerario},
title = {Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Economic Viability of Broiler Chickens Fed Partial Levels of Comfrey Leaf Meal (Symphytum Officinale)},
journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
volume = {14},
number = {4},
pages = {173-184},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20261404.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261404.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20261404.12},
abstract = {This study evaluated the effects of partially replacing soybean meal (SBM) with comfrey leaf meal (CLM) on the growth performance, carcass characteristics, and economic viability of broiler chickens. Fresh Symphytum officinale leaves were harvested, shade-dried, and milled to produce CLM. Four pelleted experimental diets were formulated to contain 0% (control), 4%, 8%, and 12% CLM inclusion levels. A total of 240 day-old Cobb 500 broiler chicks were brooded for 14 days, after which the birds were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments with three replicates of 20 birds per replicate in a completely randomized design. Growth performance, carcass traits, and economic parameters were evaluated during the growing-finishing phase. Final body weight, average daily gain (ADG), and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were significantly reduced (P0.05) but was significantly poorer at higher inclusion levels. Slaughter weight differed significantly among treatments (P0.05). Economic analysis indicated that 4% CLM inclusion produced the most favorable cost differential (160.96 TSH/kg gain) and relative cost reduction (5.90%) compared to the control. These findings suggest that partial replacement of SBM with CLM at 4% inclusion level maintains acceptable performance and carcass traits while improving economic efficiency, whereas higher inclusion levels negatively affect broiler performance.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Economic Viability of Broiler Chickens Fed Partial Levels of Comfrey Leaf Meal (Symphytum Officinale) AU - Atilio Kisanzu AU - Claudius Luziga AU - Isack Kerario Y1 - 2026/07/24 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261404.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20261404.12 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 173 EP - 184 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20261404.12 AB - This study evaluated the effects of partially replacing soybean meal (SBM) with comfrey leaf meal (CLM) on the growth performance, carcass characteristics, and economic viability of broiler chickens. Fresh Symphytum officinale leaves were harvested, shade-dried, and milled to produce CLM. Four pelleted experimental diets were formulated to contain 0% (control), 4%, 8%, and 12% CLM inclusion levels. A total of 240 day-old Cobb 500 broiler chicks were brooded for 14 days, after which the birds were randomly assigned to four dietary treatments with three replicates of 20 birds per replicate in a completely randomized design. Growth performance, carcass traits, and economic parameters were evaluated during the growing-finishing phase. Final body weight, average daily gain (ADG), and average daily feed intake (ADFI) were significantly reduced (P0.05) but was significantly poorer at higher inclusion levels. Slaughter weight differed significantly among treatments (P0.05). Economic analysis indicated that 4% CLM inclusion produced the most favorable cost differential (160.96 TSH/kg gain) and relative cost reduction (5.90%) compared to the control. These findings suggest that partial replacement of SBM with CLM at 4% inclusion level maintains acceptable performance and carcass traits while improving economic efficiency, whereas higher inclusion levels negatively affect broiler performance. VL - 14 IS - 4 ER -